Research Papers Archive

The archive papers represent work-in-progress on space-time dimensionality. Opinions & collaboration ideas welcome.



et2md2



  • R.Reformulation of Mass-Energy Equivalence: Implications for Baryon Asymmetry

    --et2md2_2025-04-12_baryon asymmetry-p.pdf

    This paper extends the reformulation of Einstein’s mass-energy equivalence from to explain the baryon asymmetry of the universe. We demonstrate that interpreting spacetime as a “2+2” dimensional structure—with two rotational spatial dimensions and two temporal dimensions, one of which man- ifests as the perceived third spatial dimension—offers profound insights into the matter-antimatter imbalance without requiring fine-tuned CP violation mecha- nisms. Within this framework, the asymmetry between the two temporal dimen- sions creates an intrinsic arrow of time that naturally favors the production of matter over antimatter during the early universe. We develop modified Sakharov conditions that incorporate the temporal-spatial dimension, deriving phase transi- tion dynamics that generate observed baryon-to-photon ratios through dimensional coupling mechanisms rather than conventional CP violation. Several observational predictions are presented that could distinguish our dimensional interpretation from standard baryogenesis theories, focusing particularly on CP violation patterns, neu- trino oscillations, and specific signatures in future collider experiments. This ap- proach potentially resolves the baryon asymmetry problem through a fundamental reinterpretation of spacetime dimensionality rather than through extensions of the Standard Model. 1 Introduction The baryon asymmetry of the universe—the observed predominance of matter over anti- matter—remains one of the most significant puzzles in modern physics. According to the Standard Model and cosmological principles, the Big Bang should have produced equal amounts of matter and antimatter, yet observations indicate a universe composed almost entirely of matter, with a baryon-to-photon ratio of approximately η≈ 6× 10− Standard approaches to explaining this asymmetry typically invoke Sakharov’s three conditions: baryon number violation, C and CP symmetry violation, and interactions outside thermal equilibrium. Various mechanisms including GUT baryogenesis, elec- troweak baryogenesis, and leptogenesis have been proposed, yet all require extensions to the Standard Model with finely-tuned parameters to generate the observed asymmetry. In previous work, we proposed a reformulation of Einstein’s mass-energy equivalence from E=mc 2 , where cis replaced by the ratio of distance ( d) to time ( t). This mathematically equivalent formulation led us to interpret spacetime as a “2+2”

  • R.Reformulation of Mass-Energy Equivalence: Implications for Black Holes

  • R.Reformulation of Mass-Energy Equivalence: Implications for Dark Matter

  • R.Reformulation of Mass-Energy Equivalence: Implications for Particle Charges and Forces

  • R.Reformulation of Mass-Energy Equivalence: Implications for Quantum Gravity

  • R.Reformulation of Mass-Energy Equivalence: Implications for Antimatter

  • R.Reformulation of Mass-Energy Equivalence: Implications for Antimatter

  • R.Reformulation of Mass-Energy Equivalence: Implications for Cosmic Temporal Structure

  • R.Reformulation of Mass-Energy Equivalence: Implications for Neutrinos

  • R.Reformulation of Mass-Energy Equivalence: Implications for Parity Violation

  • R.Reformulation of Mass-Energy Equivalence: Implications for Relativistic Effects at High Speeds

  • R.Reformulation of Mass-Energy Equivalence: Implications for Vacuum Particle Pair Creation

  • R.Reformulation of Mass-Energy Equivalence: Implications for Wave-Particle Duality

  • R.Reformulation of Mass-Energy Equivalence: Implications for Entropy

  • R.Reformulation of Mass-Energy Equivalence: Implications for Wave Propagation in Spacetime

  • R.Reformulation of Mass-Energy Equivalence: Solving the Two-Body Problem in General Relativity

  • R.Testing the 2+2 Dimensional Framework: A Novel Quantum Interference Experiment Theoretical and Experimental Physics Collaboration April 17, 2025

  • R.Reformulation of Mass-Energy Equivalence: Implications for Thermal Energy

  • R.Reformulation of Mass-Energy Equivalence: Implications for Magnetic Field

  • R.Reformulation of Mass-Energy Equivalence: Implications for Vacuum Catastrophe

  • R.Reformulation of Mass-Energy Equivalence: Explaining the Arrow of Time

  • R.Reformulation of Mass-Energy Equivalence: Resolving the Black Hole Information Paradox

  • R.Reformulation of Mass-Energy Equivalence: Unification of General Relativity and Quantum Physics

  • R.Reformulation of Mass-Energy Equivalence: Solving the MOND-Dark Matter Tension

  • R.Reformulation of Mass-Energy Equivalence: Derivation of the Standard Model Particle Spectrum

  • R.Reformulation of Mass-Energy Equivalence: Solving the Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic Ray Paradox

  • R.Reformulation of Mass-Energy Equivalence: Implications for the Ultraviolet Catastrophe

  • R.Laursian Dimensionality Theory: A Reformulation of Spacetime as a “2+2” Dimensional Structure

  • R.Novel Force Predictions from Laursian Dimensionality

  • R.Novel Particle Predictions from Laursian Dimensionality Theory

  • R.The Transcendental Nature of πand Its Implications for Rotational-Temporal Dimensional Stability

  • R.Quantum Superposition as Timeless Rotational A Novel Interpretation Within Laursian Dimensionality Theory

  • R.Derivation of the Intrinsic Gravitational Coupling from Light Speed in Laursian Dimensionality Theory

  • R.Deriving the Speed of Light from Planck Constants: A Laursian Dimensional Theory Approach

  • R.Derivation of the Gravitational Constant from Laursian Dimensionality Theory

  • R.Numerical Relationships Between Fundamental Constants in Laursian Dimensionality Theory

  • R.Deriving the Elementary Charge from Rotational Dimensional Symmetry in Laursian Dimensionality Theory

  • R.Derivation of the Planck Constant from Laursian Dimensionality Theory

  • R.Dimensional Coupling of Thermodynamic and Quantum Constants in Laursian Dimensionality Theory

  • R.The Electron-Proton Mass Ratio: A Numerical Validation of Laursian Dimensionality Theory

  • R.The Emergence of the π-System in Laursian Dimensionality Theory

  • R.Numerical Derivation of Planck Units in Laursian Dimensionality Theory

  • R.Age of the Universe: A Novel Derivation Through Laursian Dimensionality Theory

  • R.Deriving Vacuum Permittivity from Fundamental Dimensional Symmetry in Laursian Dimensionality Theory

  • R.Symmetry Across Four Dimensions in Laursian Dimensionality Theory

  • R.Constants Re-Expressed in the π-System: Dimensional Implications and Physical Interpretations

  • R.Ontological Origin of 4D Symmetry in Laursian Dimensionality Theory

  • R.Derivation of Quark Structure from Laursian Dimensionality Theory

  • R.Dimensional Oscillation as the Origin of Length Contraction in Laursian Dimensionality Theory (LDT)

  • R.Intrinsic Orientation and the Dimensional Incompleteness of Lorentzian Spacetime

  • R.Derivation of Lorentz Contraction from Oscillating Temporal Differentials in the 2+2 Dimensional Framework

  • R.Dimensional Pro jection Operators in a 2+2 Dimensional Framework: Complete Derivations and Experimental Verification

  • R.Fundamental Minimalism in Laursian Dimensionality

Developing New Physics Concepts